KImberly
Jan 4, 2026 10:30 EST
The Sunday Morning Show used to be non-political and enjoyable. I've watched CBS morning show since it debuted. Charles Kuralt and Charles Osgood focused on human stories and not their political views. It's really sad to see a wonderful show turn into such a disappointment. Not one week goes by that there isn't a story or part of a story that attacks the current president. It's just sad. President Trump was elected by US citizens, he's not a king or a threat, as Republicans are US citizens and not a threat. Please replace Jane Pauley and bring back the original format. I know you don't care at all what I think, but I try to watch this show but I'm always saddened to see how the show is now.
Roneice Bradley
Dec 21, 2025 09:15 EST
OMGosh, PLEASE enlarge the font in the OBIT descriptions, and stop using script font. The descriptions are so small and so light that I must pause my tv in order to read, especially the “script” font.
Joel Laub
Dec 14, 2025 12:24 EST
I have watched CBS Sunday Morning every Sunday since 1979 with Charles Kuralt then Charles Osgood the show was uplifting, positive and didn’t favor any political viewpoint. If there was a story with a controversial opinion both sides of the debate would be told. Since Jane Pauley has taken the moderator position the content of the show has become politically one sided and divisive with only one side of a story being told. Please take us back to the original format and make the show enjoyable for everyone.
A Wiedmann
Nov 16, 2025 11:44 EST
Just saw the Sunday Morning show and was disheartened by the extended interview with Portney, who provided fuel for white male privilege by fpositing specious arguments for irresponsibility Very disappointed in the interviewer who didn’t assert journalist integrity by choosing to avoid follow up questions. Was that prevented by and perpetuated Tony’s own privilege?
Then the remaining program highlighted two very privileged men both of whom have had problematic accusations against them.
What are the producers and editors thinking? Please persue ethics in journalism you purport to support.